President Obama Wins Nobel "Peace" Prize -- What!?

Now that is funny. Barack Obama, winning the Nobel "Peace" Prize for 2009. He hasn't accomplished anything of note, besides being elected President of the United States; which doesn't say a whole lot; this country elected George Bush twice. He won the prize, for what, being the first black President? What kind of accomplishment is that? The majority of white voters voted for Obama because he's black; the same is true of the black voters who voted for Obama. He was literally elected in the name of "making history." He was elected to the highest office in the name of affirmative action.

The only thing Barack Obama has accomplished is reading the teleprompter; even that he has problems with. He's flip-flopped on so many issues, lied, tripled the deficit in 9 short months, has dodgy associations (if the media actually did its job during the election, Obama wouldn't even be President right now), and got where he is today, because the media covered for him!

While I was trying to take in the absurdity of Barack Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize - not knowing whether to laugh or cry - and believe me, I still sometimes think it might be a practical joke played on us all - I soon learned that Obama was nominated for the Nobel, only 11 days into his Presidency! Are you kidding me? So basically, Obama was awarded the prize for his ideals - for his rhetoric - NOT for his actions.

The conspiracy theorist in me was saying that President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize after being slapped down by the IOC just a week before; too convenient I thought. Or because his approval ratings keep sinking lower. But upon finding out that Obama was nominated only 11 days after he took office, I retracted those thoughts and just chalked it up to more Obamania worship from extreme left-wing wackos.

There is another way to look at Obama getting the Nobel: Maybe he was awarded the Nobel "Peace" Prize so he has to take a different foreign policy stance against Iran; maybe the prize being awarded to Obama, is in effect, a way to influence America's hawk-like posturing against the middle east? It certainly would be smart; because the irony of Obama winning the "peace" prize is laughable, when we are fighting two wars, and are about to send an additional amount of troops into Afghanistan. Obama's rhetoric has made it clear in the past that he intends to focus our man-power and resources on winning the war in Afghanistan.

I doubt it though. I prescribe to the notion that it's Obamania that won him the award.

To the President's credit, he did seem somewhat shocked and 'humbled' that he won. I'm sure when he was first notified that he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, he let out a "WTF?" I know I did. As did many others.

Joe WIlson Was Right - Sort Of

Technically, Joe Wilson was right, when he yelled out, "You lie!" to President Obama, during his speech to Congress about illegal immigrants not getting free health care. And Technically, Barack Obama was right when he said that illegal immigrants will not be getting health care, if the/a health care reform bill passes. Obama is 'technically' right, in that illegal immigrants wont be able to get health care, because his idea, hinted at by his rhetoric, is to grant amnesty to the millions of illegal immigrants already occupying America.

Immigration reform will most likely be the President's next agenda to tackle. President Obama and the Democrats would like nothing more than to make illegal immigrants legal. In other words, the left, including Barack Obama, want to grant amnesty to illegal immigrants: This would be beneficial to the Democrats, because they would increase their voting bloc significantly. If Obama were to grant them amnesty, most Mexican-Americans would vote for the Democratic candidate - be it local political elections, Congress, or Presidential candidates who have a "D" beside their name.

Will President Obama be able to make the illegal immigrants in America legal? I'm not sure yet. But the last time I checked, most Americans, regardless of political affiliation, were against any form of amnesty.

The immigration reform debate in the upcoming months is going to create some tight spots for the President.

Michelle Obama Embellishment

I have to say, this is a poorly planned speech by Michelle Obama. Doesn't she have like 20 aides? Surely, one of them could have caught this embellishment before she delivered the speech, in front of the whole world. Did she not run this speech by one of Barack's people? Did Michelle Obama even write it? I guess we'll have to chalk this embellishment up as another Obama family curiosity, along with all of the other curiosities:

Liberal Persuasion Tactics On Political Forums

The rhetoric has died down a little in the last couple of weeks, but back when/before Obama gave his speech to Congress about health care reform, political message forums, such as Democratic Underground and The Hannity Forum, were set ablaze by newbie troll posters, sharing "heart felt personal stories" about the evils of the current health care system; basically, trying to sell President Obama's message of major health care reform, etc.

I check out a lot of political forums - but mainly, it was The Hannity Forum that was infested the most by liberal trolls trying to push Obama's message. I'm sure some of them were paid too, considering there were ads all over Craigslist for paid bloggers/posters to "help Obama." If you look around, I'm sure you'll see them on different websites (especially Craigslist). I didn't get mad reading their threads and "heart felt personal stories," as much as I got entertainment out of the whole ordeal. Most were god awful in that they absolutely sucked at sounding sincere. Most of them also tried to come across as Independents.

Anyway, speaking of Independents, there are a lot of idiots on political forums who pretend they're Independents/middle of the road posters, but mysteriously, these "Independents" usually side with Obama's ideals when debating certain subjects. I've seen it time and time again. Quite frankly, it's annoying. These are the kind of posters who like to make it seem as though they are non-partisan. Give me a break. Crap or get off the pot. These morons are usually leftists disguised as middle of the road folks. Don't buy their crap!

Not that these peoples' tactics are effective - they're not - I just find it pathetic and annoying. I have more respect for full blown libtards who present their case, instead of the posters pretending to be one thing, when they're clearly another.

Thanks for reading my rant. If there is a lesson to be learned, it is to watch out for the 'non-partisan' posters on political forums; for they are usually libtards in sheep's clothing!

Obamania Photoshops - Hope & Change Baby!

Obama Is An Arrogant Fool & Liberals Are Delusional

President Obama is an arrogant fool who can appropriately be labeled a narcissist; he's someone who thinks the world evolves around him. Barack Obama inflates his importance - at least that's the image he portrays with his speech and body language. A good example would be Obama's recent trip to Copenhagen, where he gave a speech to the IOC on why he thought Chicago should host the 2016 Olympics. The whole speech oozed with self importance - as if the IOC should grant Chicago the right to host the Olympics because President Obama had the audacity to show up. President Obama came across as though he were demanding the IOC to obey his request. The speech was an embarrassment in my opinion; it had to do with Barack and Michelle more so than it did with America & Chicago.

President Obama has always come across as an egotistical, holier than thou, jerk. In every speech that I've ever seen Obama give, he presents himself as though he's angry; like he's demanding something. His handlers should tell Obama to cool it on his angry facial expressions, and make him aware of his snooty, nose in the air, elitist 'magnetism' he seeps, with every TV appearance. It certainly isn't doing him any favors with the right - we do not look at Obama like he's a God. It would benefit Hussein Obama, if he appeared more humble.....words can't express how humorous I think the irony is of Obama vs. the world paradox; here is President Obama, probably the most arrogant President the United States has ever had, trying to make the country 'humble' before the world, constantly apologizing for the nation that elected him President. Ironic, hypocritical and sad. Just what you would expect from an empty suit liberal.

10 months into Obama's Presidency, and the moonbats on the left are still at awe with Obama's 'charisma' and speeches. They say Obama is at his best when he is persuading opposition. Ha - you mean, like, the IOC? Iran? Dissidents in the United States who do not trust him? Me?

The fact of the matter is, Obama has never been a good speaker. He's good at reading a teleprompter and looking angry and arrogant - demanding even - but not at speaking off the cuff. He's not even charismatic like the liberals exclaim. He's robotic. He's dull. The liberals are the one's who propped their God up - they are the one's setting the bar so high that expectations will not be met. And THEY are the one's who keep inflating Obama's ego.

Liberals are delusional. Hopefully, they, along with their God, will come back down to reality, after Obama was slapped down by the IOC and the world.

Note to liberals: Obama is everything that you claim him to be - in your own perverted reality - but not to the rest of the world. Obama's nothing more than a politician.

The Democrats Of The Present Are Nothing Like The Democrats Of Old

I think it's safe to say the Democrat party was taken over by far left wing nuts and socialists. The Democrats of today are nothing like your Mom's and Dad's Democrats. The leaders of the Democrat party, like Pelosi, Obama, Clinton, Dodd, Frank, etc., cannot be compared to leaders like JFK; the present day Liberals are nothing like JFK and are far to the left in their ideology.

There has been a lot of talk these last few years about the Republican party being hi-jacked by neocons - and that may be. But if that's the case, the Democratic party was most certainly hi-jacked by radical progressives.

I can remember a time (and I'm not that old), when the Democrats stood for the working man - or at least gave the impression that they were for the blue collar working man. They successfully crafted the image in the mind's of a lot of Americans as being the party representing the common man. That isn't the case today.

Today, the Democrat party is perceived as being elitist trolls. And they are. If you need an example, look no further than last year and how they treated an effing plumber, from Ohio, for expressing his views. Look no further than Nancy Pelosi - a progressive from San Fransisco, who pretends she is for the middle class, yet is completely out of touch with regular, every day working Americans. This woman used to take private jets from Washington to California, before she was exposed for being the hypocrite that she is, a few years ago. Need another example? Look at Barack and Michelle Obama. Talk about being out of touch with Americans - these two have their own chefs flown in from St. Louis for God's sake! There are many more examples of Michelle's and Barack's hypocritical ways, like talking about sacrifice while the two of them take separate jets to Copenhagen, costing the tax payers millions in the process - or ordering hundred dollar steaks - but you get the point.

Today's Democrat party are filled with hardcore progressives. Today's Democrat party are filled with hypocritical elitists - and they are nothing like the Dems of old. The new age Liberals who control the Democrat party are the worst of the lot, because they preach about social justice, while they sit in their million dollar mansions; they talk about diversity and tolerance, while they live in gated, almost exclusively white communities. The Liberals in control of the Democrat party today like to claim they represent the common man/working man, but they DO NOT. And the voters who continually vote these idiots into power are brain dead sheep.

Communist News Network Anchor In Utter Disbelief That Chicago Was Eliminated

This is comedy gold. This CNN news anchor cannot believe that Chicago was eliminated in the first round, with the least amount of votes, by the IOC:

Barack Hussein Obama: Quotes That Make You Go Hmmm

"......it was also interesting to see that political interaction in Europe is not that different from the United States Senate. There's a lot of -- I don't know what the term is in Austrian, wheeling and dealing."

"No, no. I have been practicing...I bowled a 129. It's like -- it was like Special Olympics, or something."

"I didn't want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about doing any seances."

"I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody."

"What I was suggesting -- you're absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith..."

"Let me introduce to you the next President -- the next Vice President of the United States of America, Joe Biden."

"Just this past week, we passed out of the out of the U.S. Senate Banking Committee -- which is my committee -- a bill to call for divestment from Iran as way of ratcheting up the pressure to ensure that they don't obtain a nuclear weapon."

"Let me be absolutely clear. Israel is a strong friend of Israel's. It will be a strong friend of Israel's under a McCain...administration. It will be a strong friend of Israel's under an Obama administration. So that policy is not going to change."

"On this Memorial Day, as our nation honors its unbroken line of fallen heroes -- and I see many of them in the audience here today -- our sense of patriotism is particularly strong."

"I've now been in 57 states -- I think one left to go."

"It's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

"The point I was making was not that Grandmother harbors any racial animosity. She doesn't. But she is a typical white person, who, if she sees somebody on the street that she doesn't know, you know, there's a reaction that's been bred in our experiences that don't go away and that sometimes come out in the wrong way, and that's just the nature of race in our society."

"In case you missed it, this week, there was a tragedy in Kansas. Ten thousand people died -- an entire town destroyed."

"My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world. I hope you'll join with me as we try to change it."

Yes He Can't - Obama Loses Bid To Have Olympics In Chicago

Chicago was shot down during the first round. The IOC obviously didn't get the memo that Barack Obama is a God!

I'll be the first to admit that having the Olympics in Chicago - or any American city - would have been cool, and would benefit our economy. By that same token, I'm glad Obama's ego was shot down; maybe now he can concentrate on our economy and the war in Afghanistan.

Did Obama seriously think he could win Chicago the privilege of hosting the Olympics, by merely showing up? Considering his naivety, I wouldn't doubt it.

Tim Pawlenty To Run For President?

According to Politico, Tim Pawlenty has his eyes set on the White House:

Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty has been quietly assembling the blueprint of a presidential campaign and will announce Thursday the support of a group of high-level political strategists and donors, complemented by a handful of top new media consultants, POLITICO has learned.

Pawlenty, under the radar of D.C.’s political community, has locked up some of the key operatives who engineered then-President George W. Bush’s reelection campaign — a significant feat for a little-known Midwestern politician.

The moves underscore, and will lend credence to, the emerging belief among many establishment Republicans that Pawlenty is becoming the sole viable alternative to former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, a potential Republican primary rival. The Minnesota governor has even gone so far as to contact some of Romney’s former supporters.

Story continued at: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27785.html

My thoughts: It is waaaaaay too early, in my opinion, to be announcing a bid for the White House, by any Republican. We haven't even had the 2010 mid-term elections yet. I suppose it's wise for Tim Pawlenty to get ahead of the curve, financially and politically. But he needs to keep himself out of the main stream media as much as possible. It would be political suicide for him to start campaigning now. "Over saturation" comes to mind. The American public just got over the longest Presidential race in history, 10 months ago. For nearly two years we had to endure the endless rhetoric from Republican and Democrat hopefuls.

I haven't read up on Tim Pawlenty all that much, but know that he's a two-term Governor of Minnesota, and is Republican. He's a smart guy - but is he Conservative enough?

The best political strategy, as of right now, would be to let Barack Obama and the Dems implode all by themselves. Let them have center stage. Soon enough, Americans will get hungry for change. The President's poll numbers are continually dropping.

It's important for Republican opposition in Washington to publicly criticize Obama and his policies when it's called for, but hopefully, the GOP machine will hold the political cards close to its chest. For now anyways.

Obama has center stage - and the people voted for that "change." Let the President tie his own knot.

Income Gap Widens Under President Obama

President Obama's hope & change slogan seems to have passed the middle class/poor by. Maybe this was the change Obama was talking about:

The recession has hit middle-income and poor families hardest, widening the economic gap between the richest and poorest Americans as rippling job layoffs ravage household budgets.

The wealthiest 10% of Americans — those making more than $138,000 a year — earned 11.4 times the $12,000 or so made by those living near or below the poverty line in 2008, according to newly released census figures. That ratio is an increase from 11.2 in 2007 and the previous high o11.22 in 2003.

Household income declined across all groups, but more sharply for middle-income and poor Americans. Median income fell last year from $52,163 to $50,303, wiping out a decade's worth of gains to hit the lowest level since 1997. the median is the midpoint — half of households made more, half less.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-09-29-income-gap-census_N.htm

My thoughts: There's still a lot of hope out there, but little change. With the Government spending the way it is, just wait until the Bush tax cuts expire. President Obama will have no choice but to raise taxes on the middle class, thus widening the income gap even more.

I know liberals love to make the case of, "Give Obama time, he hasn't been President long enough to clean up Bush's mess." Let's not forget, the Democrats have controlled congress since 2006. And when is it okay to judge Obama's policies? We're going into the 10th month of his term. Obama himself said that if the stimulus package was passed, unemployment would not go above 8.5%. We now stand at 9.7% unemployment.

If the liberals had their way, they would still be asking us to be patient in year 4 of Obama's presidency -- "Just give him another 4 years."

POTUS Quotes - Ronald Reagan

You can tell alot about a fellow's character by his way of eating jellybeans.

Without God, democracy will not and cannot long endure.

Within the covers of the Bible are the answers for all the problems men face.

While I take inspiration from the past, like most Americans, I live for the future.

When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat.

What we have found in this country, and maybe we're more aware of it now, is one problem that we've had, even in the best of times, and that is the people who are sleeping on the grates, the homeless, you might say, by choice.

Welfare's purpose should be to eliminate, as far as possible, the need for its own existence.

We will always remember. We will always be proud. We will always be prepared, so we will always be free.

We should measure welfare's success by how many people leave welfare, not by how many are added.

We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.

We might come closer to balancing the Budget if all of us lived closer to the Commandments and the Golden Rule.

We have the duty to protect the life of an unborn child

We can't help everyone, but everyone can help someone.

To sit back hoping that someday, some way, someone will make things right is to go on feeding the crocodile, hoping he will eat you last - but eat you he will.

To paraphrase Winston Churchill, I did not take the oath I have just taken with the intention of presiding over the dissolution of the world's strongest economy.

Thomas Jefferson once said, 'We should never judge a president by his age, only by his works.' And ever since he told me that, I stopped worrying.

They say the world has become too complex for simple answers. They are wrong.

There are no great limits to growth because there are no limits of human intelligence, imagination, and wonder.

There are no constraints on the human mind, no walls around the human spirit, no barriers to our progress except those we ourselves erect.

The problem is not that people are taxed too little, the problem is that government spends too much.

The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.

The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would steal them away.

Surround yourself with the best people you can find, delegate authority, and don't interfere as long as the policy you've decided upon is being carried out.

Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the democrats believe every day is April 15.

Protecting the rights of even the least individual among us is basically the only excuse the government has for even existing.

Politics is not a bad profession. If you succeed there are many rewards, if you disgrace yourself you can always write a book.

Politics is just like show business. You have a hell of an opening, coast for a while, and then have a hell of a close.

Politics I supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first.

One way to make sure crime doesn't pay would be to let the government run it.

No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!

My philosophy of life is that if we make up our mind what we are going to make of our lives, then work hard toward that goal, we never lose - somehow we win out.

Mr Gorbachev, tear down this wall!

Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.

Where Did All The Anti-War Liberals Go?

It is now clear that Iraq and Afghanistan were politicized during the 2008 Presidential election. Both wars were politicized by President Obama and his liberal supporters.

In 2008, when the surge was proven to be a success in Iraq, the main stream media blitzed the airways on a 24-7 loop, telling the American audience how our soldiers needed to come home from Iraq; that it was a bunk war; highlighting casualties. Barack Obama ran on the platform of bringing the troops home ASAP were he to get elected....Obama, after all, thought going into Iraq was a mistake in the first place.

But my beef isn't with President Obama for politicizing both wars - he's already proven to be full of rhetoric, so his shift in policy doesn't come as a big surprise. My beef is with the hypocritical, anti-war liberals, who voted for Obama on the premise that he would bring an end to the war in Iraq. These hypocritical Obama supporters are littered in the media as well. They've all but stopped putting emphasis on Iraq and Afghanistan.

I try not to generalize; there are quite a few disappointed liberals out there, who, through their naivety, thought Obama was sincere in his rhetoric. But most of the liberal base are not holding Obama accountable. These 'anti-war' liberals were anti-war before the election. As soon as Obama got elected, they forgot Iraq and Afghanistan. Those in the media who once played the 24-7 loop about the disaster of both wars, since Obama has been President, have conveniently forgotten their pre-election outrage.

Never mind that Obama lied. Never mind that he's full of rhetoric. Never mind that he contradicts himself and talks out both sides of his mouth in speeches on a weekly basis. Most of us who have been paying attention, and are not naive, have come to expect such. But what is really outrageous, is the manufactured outrage on both wars pre-election, compared to now. Obama's army politicized both wars right alongside him; his supporters are a bunch of damned hypocrites.

Obama Cultists Caught On Camera Praying To Their Master

Well, you have to hand it to Obama; he stirs emotions within people. Some people he makes angry, others, well, you be the judge:

http://www.breitbart.tv/shock-discovery-community-organizers-pray-to-president-elect-obama/

I bet even the moderates who supported and still support Obama are cringing right now, after viewing that clip.

Obama proves you can continually fool the naive sheep in this country on pure rhetoric alone. Although, the praying is a little much, I must say. That's going far beyond the support even Bill Clinton had. In fact, that's super moonbat territory! You really have to wonder about their mental health.

This is part of the reason you get such strong reactions from some of his die hard supporters when you criticize or disagree with the President: He has an army of moonbats as his disposal!

Thomas Jefferson Quotes

A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.

I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever, in religion, in philosophy, in politics or in anything else, where I was capable of thinking for myself. Such an addiction is the last degradation of a free and moral agent. If I could not go to Heaven but with a party, I would not go there at all.

No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him.

The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it to be always kept alive. It will often be exercised when wrong, but better so than not to be exercised at all. I like a little rebellion now and then.

And, finally, that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself; that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them.

What a stupendous, what an incomprehensible machine is man! Who can endure toil, famine, stripes, imprisonment & death itself in vindication of his own liberty, and the next moment ... inflict on his fellow men a bondage, one hour of which is fraught with more misery than ages of that which he rose in rebellion to oppose.

Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle.

A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government, and this is necessary to close the circle of our felicity.

Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves, therefore, are its only safe depositories.

I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground: That 'all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States or to the people' (10th Amendment). To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specifically drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible to any definition.

Is uniformity attainable? Millions of innocent men, women, and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined, imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity. What has been the effect of coercion? To make one half the world fools, and the other half hypocrites.

Yes, we did produce a near-perfect republic. But will they keep it? Or will they, in the enjoyment of plenty, lose the memory of freedom? Material abundance without character is the path of destruction.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.

We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty or profusion and servitude. If we run into such debt, as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our calling and our creeds...[we will] have no time to think, no means of calling our miss-managers to account but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains on the necks of our fellow-sufferers... And this is the tendency of all human governments. A departure from principle in one instance becomes a precedent for[ another]... till the bulk of society is reduced to be mere automatons of misery... And the fore-horse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression.

An elective despotism was not the government we fought for, but one which should not only be founded on true free principles, but in which the powers of government should be so divided and balanced among general bodies of magistracy, as that no one could transcend their legal limits without being effectually checked and restrained by the others.

Barack Hussein Obama Gaffe Videos